Skip to main content

How do you validate knowledge accuracy?

A
Written by Axel May Rivera
Updated this week

Direct Answer (TL;DR)

Brilo AI validates knowledge accuracy by testing the best AI phone answering system in a controlled environment, reviewing call transcripts and system insights, and using human reviewers to confirm or correct answers (human-in-the-loop). Brilo AI voice agent capabilities also support staged automated learning (self-learning) that can be enabled only after reviewers sign off.

Why This Question Comes Up (problem context)

Organizations ask how to validate knowledge accuracy because incorrect answers damage customer trust and create operational risk. Teams need a repeatable process to confirm that the Brilo AI voice agent returns answers that match source-of-truth documents. Validation matters before production, after knowledge updates, and when switching automated learning modes.

How It Works (High-Level)

Validation for the Brilo AI voice agent follows a test, review, correct, and re-test loop. First, a test agent is loaded with the target knowledge base and assigned a test phone number. Test calls generate call transcripts and automated insights. Human reviewers check transcripts and insight tags, mark items as accurate or needing revision, and those markings drive knowledge edits. Optionally, the Brilo AI voice agent self-learning settings can be used so approved changes propagate automatically after a review step.

Guardrails & Boundaries

Brilo AI's best phone answering system must be constrained with clear guardrails. Common guardrails include a confidence threshold that forces escalation when the agent is unsure, restricted topics that the agent will not answer, and explicit stop conditions for sensitive requests. Brilo AI recommends keeping automated learning disabled during initial validation. If self-learning is enabled, require pre-approval workflows so the Brilo AI voice agent cannot incorporate unverified examples.

If the Brilo AI voice agent cannot confirm required details, the configured fallback should route the call to a human agent or a safe message. Validation processes should never rely solely on transcripts when audio quality or transcription confidence is low.

Applied Examples

  • A billing team validates the Brilo AI voice agent by running scripted calls for refunds and billing disputes. Reviewers confirm the agent uses the approved billing policy text.

  • A support team loads updated product FAQs and runs unscripted test calls. The Brilo AI voice agent identifies intent correctly and reviewers mark new answer variants as accurate.

  • A compliance team runs edge-case scenarios against restricted topics. The Brilo AI voice agent follows the defined restriction and escalates when appropriate.

Human Handoff & Escalation

Human handoff is part of the Brilo AI's best phone answering system. The Brilo AI voice agent can escalate when confidence is below the configured threshold or when a caller requests a person. Handoffs should include a short summary of intent and collected context so the human reviewer (human-in-the-loop) can act immediately. Validation should confirm that context is passed correctly during every escalation path.

Setup Requirements

To validate knowledge accuracy you need the following for the Brilo AI voice agent:

  • An Admin or Agent configuration role to create and manage test agents.

  • A dedicated test agent and an assigned test phone number or internal dial-in to avoid impacting live traffic.

  • Knowledge sources uploaded into the Brilo AI knowledge module. Organize content and remove outdated passages.

  • Call recording and transcription enabled for test calls so call transcripts and automated insights are captured.

  • A review team that includes subject-matter experts and QA reviewers to mark items as Accurate or Needs revision in the Evals test module.

  • If using automated learning, a documented approval process that reviewers will follow before allowing changes to propagate.

For guidance on staged self-learning and continuous improvement, see Brilo AI’s self-learning capabilities.

Business Outcomes

Validating knowledge accuracy reduces incorrect responses and customer friction. A validated Brilo AI voice agent improves first contact resolution by aligning answers to source-of-truth materials. Teams also reduce repeat questions and lower escalation volume by fixing knowledge gaps before production. When validation is paired with controlled automated learning, the Brilo AI voice agent can evolve while preserving accuracy.

Next Step

If you are ready to build the best phone answering system, review Brilo AI guidance on accuracy and analytics. Then, create a test agent and an evals test group. Start with scripted high-risk calls and add unscripted calls for coverage. For assistance on support validation setup, book a call with our team today!

Did this answer your question?